Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220413052759.4859-1-mahak_g@cs.iitr.ac.in> <20226182-81b2-92b9-d286-d9520a1d568b@lwfinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <20226182-81b2-92b9-d286-d9520a1d568b@lwfinger.net>
From:   MAHAK GUPTA <mahak_g@cs.iitr.ac.in>
Date:   Fri, 15 Apr 2022 03:31:00 +0530
Message-ID: <CANnaPbDceguo6K2FeZ1OT8Woz9-RYJyn+gptsVTXnaLstTz+zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove else after return and break statements
To:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc:     Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Larry and Pavel,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:21 PM Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> wrote:
>
> On 4/13/22 00:27, Mahak Gupta wrote:
> > Else is not necessary after return and break statements, hence remove
> > it.
> >
> > Reported by checkpatch:
> >
> > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mahak Gupta <mahak_g@cs.iitr.ac.in>
>
> The commit message is redundant. I would suggest the following:
>
> checkpatch reports the following:
>
> WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
>
> Remove those cases.
This patch is merged by Greg now but I'll keep this in mind for next
patches. Thanks

>
>
> > ---
> >   drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ieee80211.c | 41 ++++++++------------
> >   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ieee80211.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ieee80211.c
> > index 5a0e42ed4a47..bb4c9bc864da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ieee80211.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ieee80211.c
> > @@ -97,16 +97,15 @@ bool      rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(u8 *rate)
> >
> >   int rtw_check_network_type(unsigned char *rate, int ratelen, int channel)
> >   {
> > -     if (channel > 14) {
> > +     if (channel > 14)
> >               return WIRELESS_INVALID;
> > -     } else {  /*  could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */
> > -             if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate))
> > -                     return WIRELESS_11B;
> > -             else if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate))
> > -                     return  WIRELESS_11BG;
> > -             else
> > -                     return WIRELESS_11G;
> > -     }
> > +     /*  could be pure B, pure G, or B/G */
> > +     if (rtw_is_cckratesonly_included(rate))
> > +             return WIRELESS_11B;
> > +     else if (rtw_is_cckrates_included(rate))
> > +             return  WIRELESS_11BG;
> > +     else
> > +             return WIRELESS_11G;
>
> Is this 'else' necessary?
Yeah, we can remove this else too, sorry didn't notice it. Should I
submit another patch removing this?

>
>
> Larry

Mahak