Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933153AbXEDP3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 11:29:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933156AbXEDP3X (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 11:29:23 -0400 Received: from smtp-out001.kontent.com ([81.88.40.215]:33674 "EHLO smtp-out.kontent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933152AbXEDP3W convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 11:29:22 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum To: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [patch]clarification of coding style regarding conditional statements with two branches Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:29:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200705040926.55257.oliver@neukum.org> <463B47AF.4010503@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <463B47AF.4010503@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705041729.04771.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 616 Lines: 20 Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2007 16:48 schrieb Jiri Slaby: > Why, what's wrong with > if (condition) { > ????????do_this(); > ????????do_that(); > } else > ????????otherwise(); > > ? It's more readable/nicer in my eyes than Than I am afraid we need to agree to disagree. But then I would insist that neither side give the other a hard to time over this issue. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/