Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <bc3a3162-b34d-bff3-2109-e2fd0bc65bb4@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:19:53 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.6.2
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over
 aux_bus
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        "Sankeerth Billakanti" <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
CC:     quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@quicinc.com>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@quicinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
        "Steev Klimaszewski" <steev@kali.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        "Aravind Venkateswaran" <quic_aravindh@quicinc.com>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>,
        freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
References: <1649938766-6768-1-git-send-email-quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
 <CAD=FV=Ui6BAsnTaJ2_TMh1Tnjtaw7FR92aWoUysS+UT=c0qB3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20afcd97-4b8d-f770-151a-268b893b7c5a@linaro.org>
 <CAE-0n51fc-b-8VF7XP29=o8Xi86HQALGB-1u8n3b_3NjVyyJYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <e3154f3b-aea4-6961-b409-6b20ff8bf18e@quicinc.com>
 <2fd4a157-a9de-ca0e-7a47-7bb85199ae91@linaro.org>
From:   Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <2fd4a157-a9de-ca0e-7a47-7bb85199ae91@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 4/14/2022 1:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry
>>
>> On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
>>>> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
>>>>> <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These changes are dependent on the following series:
>>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=* 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
>>>>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
>>>>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
>>>>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
>>>>> at the beginning of your series?
>>>>
>>>> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
>>>> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
>>>> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>>>>
>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>>>>
>>>> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
>>>> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also 
>>>> be good.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you resend those as not RFC?
>>
>> Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
>>
>> Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing 
>> them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees 
>> due to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we 
>> should get these landed ).
>>
>> Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post 
>> them, I can ack the.
> 
> Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have 
> already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were merged 
> during last window).
> 
I thought you might have to rebase them :) that way you could have 
resent the rebased patch with the RFC tag removed.

If you dont, you now have my R-b.

Thanks

Abhinav
>