Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031701AbXEDVFl (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 17:05:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031707AbXEDVFl (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 17:05:41 -0400 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:40878 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031701AbXEDVFk (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 17:05:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 23:03:46 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3_Bilski?= cc: Dave Jones , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up In-Reply-To: <463B9380.5090503@interia.pl> Message-ID: References: <463B687D.1020600@interia.pl> <463B9380.5090503@interia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 664 Lines: 21 On May 4 2007 22:11, Rafał Bilski wrote: >> >>> It has big latency and requires so much preparation that it isn't worth >>> if You don't need to save power or cool down CPU. >> >> I found frequency switching on my VIA to be fast enough. > >Timer frequency equal to 1000Hz? The regular irq0 timer ticks at 250. What I meant is that I do not have to wait more than 0.5 seconds for cpufreq-set to finish. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/