Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <909c4006-255a-a70d-afa2-c821a6e7b28d@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:29:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: support DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK()
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
References: <20211030020813.32654-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
 <Ylavaf+OlgTVeI6a@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <6fe36857-1c94-a421-0701-caf9c38b1c92@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <6fe36857-1c94-a421-0701-caf9c38b1c92@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 4/13/22 08:19, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/13/22 04:09, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:08:13PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Support the DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK() macro that is used to declare
>>> a bitmap by converting the macro to DECLARE_BITMAP(), as has been done
>>> for the __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK() macro.
>>>
>>> This fixes a 'make htmldocs' warning:
>>>
>>> include/linux/phylink.h:82: warning: Function parameter or member 'DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK(supported_interfaces' not described in 'phylink_config'
>>>
>>> that was introduced by commit
>>>   38c310eb46f5 ("net: phylink: add MAC phy_interface_t bitmap")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>>> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>>> Cc: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
>>
>> Thanks Randy, sorry I missed this patch.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>>
>> What is the intention for merging this patch? Will Jon merge it?
>> Your tags said To: Jon but you don't seem to have included him in
>> the email.
> 
> Hm, I didn't notice that.
> Guess I'll resend it with your R-b.

No need to resend it. It's already merged into mainline.

-- 
~Randy