Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: dwc2: Add bindings for new Ingenic
 SoCs.
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        hminas@synopsys.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, dragancecavac@yahoo.com,
        dongsheng.qiu@ingenic.com, qipengzhen <aric.pzqi@ingenic.com>,
        rick.tyliu@ingenic.com, sernia.zhou@foxmail.com,
        zhenwenjin@gmail.com, reimu@sudomaker.com
References: <1649788201-87620-1-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
 <1649788201-87620-2-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
 <6F03670F-9040-4560-AD78-CC7A03EC678F@goldelico.com>
 <c79a8ff7-7a3f-9627-f910-dbbf942e34cb@wanyeetech.com>
 <0AE74BF9-46F1-44EC-8E5F-40EA12851AD0@goldelico.com>
 <76ea346b-0645-97b5-f8fb-5b46b4bcc80b@linaro.org>
 <F6929BAA-D552-4C34-B392-33AEA263F0C9@goldelico.com>
From:   Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>
Message-ID: <40d34f8b-4ab7-5ced-b533-da1f4b501cdc@wanyeetech.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Apr 2022 01:11:37 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F6929BAA-D552-4C34-B392-33AEA263F0C9@goldelico.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 2022/4/14 下午6:00, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>
>> Am 14.04.2022 um 09:32 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>:
>>
>> On 13/04/2022 21:30, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> So we need "snps,dwc2" to get any driver match and I thought the "ingenic,jz4780-otg" is redundant.
>>>
>>> But maintainers convinced me to keep it as a dummy compatible in the .dtsi for potential future
>>> specialization (which does not exist and seems not to be necessary).
>> Isn't exactly the next patch 2/2 using such specialization?
>>
>>> Unless I can convince them
>>> that this is never ever needed. Which is beyond my knowledge and almost everyone.
>>>
>>> So we can't remove the "snps,dwc2" here.
>>>
>>> Well, we can with more work elsewhere.
>>> You have to extend the dwc2_of_match_table to include all ingenic devices.
>>>
>>> Therefore we now know 3 potential solutions:
>>> a) remove "ingenic,jz4780-otg" from jz4780.dtsi (my proposal)
>>> b) add "ingenic,jz4780-otg" to dwc2.yaml together with "snps,dwc2" (your proposal + my suggestion here)
>>> c) add only "ingenic,jz4780-otg" to dwc2.yaml and extend the match table in drivers//usb/dwc2/params.c (new proposals)
>>>
>>>  From consistency point of view I think variant b) is the right one. a) was rejected and c) only adds redundant code.
>> c) was already proposed by Zhou, so if you think the code is not correct
>> (the params for jz4780) maybe nack it there, so we will know that driver
>> needs fixes.
> Ah, ok. Now I see. I was just focussed on this patch and related dtbscheck
> messages and did not read patch 2/2.
>
> Yes, looking at both, they are variant c). Sorry that I didn't see it earlier.

It looks like we need a [3/3] to remove "snps,dwc2", which not only solves
the dtbscheck complaining problem, but also doesn't affect normal use after
removing "snps,dwc2".


>
> As said: I am open to anything as long as the dtbscheck doesn't complain any more.
>
> BR and sorry for the confusion,
> Nikolaus