Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767906AbXEDX1O (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 19:27:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767907AbXEDX1N (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 19:27:13 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:57443 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767906AbXEDX1M (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 19:27:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist Dell Optiplex 320 from using the HPET From: john stultz To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton , "Guilherme M. Schroeder" , lkml , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <200705050118.34711.ak@suse.de> References: <1178314144.6094.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200705050118.34711.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 16:27:08 -0700 Message-Id: <1178321228.6094.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1919 Lines: 47 On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 01:18 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Friday 04 May 2007 23:29:04 john stultz wrote: > > One of the 2.6.21 regressions was Guilherme's problem seeing his box > > lock up when the system detected an unstable TSC and dropped back to > > using the HPET. > > > > In digging deeper, we found the HPET is not actually incrementing on > > this system. And in fact, the reason why this issue just cropped up was > > because of Thomas's clocksource watchdog code was comparing the TSC to > > the HPET (which wasn't moving) and thought the TSC was broken. > > > > Anyway, Guliherme checked for a BIOS update and did not find one, so > > I've added a DMI blacklist against his system so the HPET is not used. > > > > Many thanks to Guilherme for the slow and laborious testing that finally > > narrowed down this issue. > > Before going to hard to maintain DMI black lists we should first check > if it's a more general problem and can't it be solved better? Most likely > that system isn't the one with this issue and I don't want to apply > DMI patches forever. We can give it a whirl, I just didn't want to add yet another "compare with some other counter that may or may not work" check. In this case, probably reading three times in a row and getting the same result would be a clearly broken box. > In particular: what lspci chipset does it have? If it's Intel it might be > worth checking the datasheet if there is some "HPET stop" bit -- perhaps it > could be fixed up. Guilherme: Could you provide lspci output? > We seem to have a couple of Intel systems recently with HPET trouble. Ok, I wasn't aware it was a common issue. thanks -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/