Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:19:27 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] add support for enum module parameters
Message-ID: <YlgfXxjefuxiXjtC@kroah.com>
References: <20220414123033.654198-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220414123033.654198-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 03:30:32PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hey, I've sent this before, ages ago, but haven't really followed
> through with it. I still think it would be useful for many scenarios
> where a plain number is a clumsy interface for a module param.
> 
> Thoughts?

We should not be adding new module parameters anyway (they operate on
code, not data/devices), so what would this be used for?

thanks,

greg k-h