Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:10:03 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
        s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Ignore create mem entry for
 resource table
Message-ID: <20220414161003.GA698343@p14s>
References: <20220331084007.2323377-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220331084007.2323377-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 04:40:07PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Resource table is used by Linux to get information pubished by

s/pubished/published

> remote processor. It should be not be used for memory allocation, so
> not create rproc mem entry.
> 
> Fixes: b29b4249f8f0 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX specific parse fw hook")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> V3:
>  Update commit log
>  Update Fixes tag
> 
> V2:
>  Add Fixes tag
>  Separate the patch from https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20220111033333.403448-7-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
>  Address typo
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 7a096f1891e6..f2bfc9077c19 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		if (!strcmp(it.node->name, "vdev0buffer"))
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (!strncmp(it.node->name, "rsc-table", strlen("rsc-table")))
> +			continue;
> +

Any reason the handling of vdev0buffer is using strcmp() and the resource table
strncmp()?

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
>  		if (!rmem) {
>  			dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>