Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:22:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:22:00 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:42182 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:21:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:59:10 +0530 From: Maneesh Soni To: Ingo Molnar Cc: LKML , Rusty Subject: Re: smp_call_function & BH handlers Message-ID: <20011127215910.I14200@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: maneesh@in.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20011127185739.H14200@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:28:49PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:28:49PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Maneesh Soni wrote: > > > Why is it ok to call smp_call_function from bottom half handlers? [...] > > which part of the kernel is calling smp_call_function() from bh contexts? > > Ingo I am working with Dipankar on Read-Copy Update, and experimenting with smp_call_function(). We believed the comments for this routine and faced this problem. That's why this question came. I have not yet searched kernel sources for such places hence not sure whether there are really such places or not. Maneesh -- Maneesh Soni IBM Linux Technology Center, IBM India Software Lab, Bangalore. Phone: +91-80-5044999 email: maneesh@in.ibm.com http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rcupdate.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/