Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <d5a33645-fac1-9c69-afe6-654bfe93ca48@amlogic.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:40:10 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: discard the common MMC sub
 clock framework
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
CC:     <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@amlogic.com>,
        Victor Wan <victor.wan@amlogic.com>,
        XianWei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>,
        Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com>,
        BiChao Zheng <bichao.zheng@amlogic.com>,
        YongHui Yu <yonghui.yu@amlogic.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220402074921.13316-1-liang.yang@amlogic.com>
 <20220402074921.13316-2-liang.yang@amlogic.com>
 <20220404103034.48ec16b1@xps13>
 <50105d6b-8ced-1b72-30cb-a709c4a4dd26@amlogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <50105d6b-8ced-1b72-30cb-a709c4a4dd26@amlogic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Miquel,

i have some confusion when i prepare the patches. for DT compatibility, 
it falls back to the old DT when failed to get resource by the new DT, 
but there is some points:
a. old DT depends on MMC sub clock driver, but it never be merged, so it 
can't work.
b. if it falls back to the old DT, beside the regmap lookup below, it 
seems that we have to preserve the code of the old clock setting in 
nfc_clk_init(). do we still need to avoid break DT compatibility?

Thanks.

On 2022/4/11 10:40, Liang Yang wrote:
>>>       nfc->dev = dev;
>>> -    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> -    nfc->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>>> +    nfc->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nfc");
>>
>> This change seems unrelated.
> 
> To be consistent with the following 
> devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "emmc"). do you mean that we 
> don't need it?>
>>>       if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
>>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
>>> -    nfc->reg_clk =
>>> -        syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
>>> -                        "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
>>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
>>> -        dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
>>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
>>> -    }
>>> +    nfc->sd_emmc_clock = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, 
>>> "emmc");
>>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock))
>>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>
>> While I agree this is much better than the previous solution, we cannot
>> break DT compatibility, so you need to try getting the emmc clock, but
>> if it fails you should fallback to the regmap lookup.
> 
> ok, i will fix it next version. thanks.
> 
>>
>>>       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);