Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:33:28 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 34/49] spi: cadence-quadspi: fix protocol
 setup for non-1-1-X operations
Message-ID: <YlyHqKVBC9u1F9xS@sashalap>
References: <20220412004411.349427-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20220412004411.349427-34-sashal@kernel.org>
 <d618fc184f162b1da8d75729b5939bed52308040.camel@ew.tq-group.com>
 <YlVrbR6Giy2OXe1R@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YlVrbR6Giy2OXe1R@sirena.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 01:07:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 01:49:19PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>
>Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
>readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
>you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
>discussion is being addressed.
>
>> what's your plan regarding this patch and the other patch I sent [1]? I
>> think there has been some confusion regarding which solution we want to
>> backport to stable kernels (well, at least I'm confused...)
>
>Well, it's up to the stable people what they choose to backport -
>they're generally fairly aggressive about what they pick up so I guess
>they want to take this one?
>
>> I'm fine with this patch getting backported, but in that case [1]
>> doesn't make sense anymore (in fact I expected this patch to be dropped
>> for now when I submitted [1], due to Pratyush Yadav's concerns).
>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/spi-devel-general/patch/20220406132832.199777-1-matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com/
>
>For the benefit of those playing at home that's "spi: cadence-quadspi:
>fix incorrect supports_op() return value".  It's much more the sort of
>thing I'd expect to see backported to stable so it seems good from that
>point of view.

I'm a bit confused as I don't see the other patch in Linus's tree?

I'll queue this one up then...

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha