Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423259AbXEEJk7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 05:40:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423264AbXEEJk7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 05:40:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34034 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423259AbXEEJk6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 05:40:58 -0400 To: clameter@sgi.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dgc@sgi.com, Eric Dumazet , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation References: <20070504221555.642061626@sgi.com> <20070504221708.596112123@sgi.com> From: Andi Kleen Date: 05 May 2007 12:38:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070504221708.596112123@sgi.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 574 Lines: 9 clameter@sgi.com writes: > > NOTE: This patch is for conceptual review. I'd appreciate any feedback > especially on the locking approach taken here. It will be critical to > resolve the locking issue for this approach to become feasable. Do you have any numbers on how this improves dcache reclaim under memory pressure? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/