Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   cgel.zte@gmail.com
To:     ohad@wizery.com
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] hwspinlock: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:55:08 +0000
Message-Id: <20220418105508.2558696-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 33eeff94fc2a..1fb3a2550e29 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -94,11 +94,9 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * the module SYSSTATUS register
 	 */
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto runtime_err;
-	}
 
 	/* Determine number of locks */
 	i = readl(io_base + SYSSTATUS_OFFSET);
-- 
2.25.1