Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934130AbXEERwV (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 13:52:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934152AbXEERwV (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 13:52:21 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.93.40.71]:40058 "EHLO holomorphy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934130AbXEERwU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 13:52:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 02:55:10 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: David Miller , a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, tgraf@suug.ch, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, phillips@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12 Message-ID: <20070505095510.GA19966@holomorphy.com> References: <20070504102651.923946304@chello.nl> <20070504.122716.31641374.davem@davemloft.net> <20070505094300.GA9592@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070505094300.GA9592@infradead.org> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1486 Lines: 30 On Fri, 04 May 2007 12:26:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> There is a fundamental deadlock associated with paging; On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:27:16PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> I know you'd really like people like myself to review this work, but a >> set of 40 patches is just too much to try and digest at once >> especially when I have other things going on. When I have lots of >> other things already on my plate, when I see a huge patch set like >> this I have to just say "delete" because I don't kid myself since >> I know I'll never get to it. >> Sorry there's now way I can review this with my current workload. On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:43:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There also quite alot of only semi-related thing in there. It would > be much better to only do the network stack and iscsi parts first > and leave nfs out for a while. Especially as the former are definitively > useful while I strongly doubt that for swap over nfs. This is backward. As much as we hate it, the common case is swap over nfs, essentially because that is/was how things were commonly set up for other operating systems. I'm not a Solaris administrator, though, so various disclaimers apply. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/