Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 091/105] dm integrity: fix memory corruption when tag_size is less than digest size
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:13:33 +0200
Message-Id: <20220418121149.218998572@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220418121145.140991388@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20220418121145.140991388@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

commit 08c1af8f1c13bbf210f1760132f4df24d0ed46d6 upstream.

It is possible to set up dm-integrity in such a way that the
"tag_size" parameter is less than the actual digest size. In this
situation, a part of the digest beyond tag_size is ignored.

In this case, dm-integrity would write beyond the end of the
ic->recalc_tags array and corrupt memory. The corruption happened in
integrity_recalc->integrity_sector_checksum->crypto_shash_final.

Fix this corruption by increasing the tags array so that it has enough
padding at the end to accomodate the loop in integrity_recalc() being
able to write a full digest size for the last member of the tags
array.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -4232,6 +4232,7 @@ try_smaller_buffer:
 	}
 
 	if (ic->internal_hash) {
+		size_t recalc_tags_size;
 		ic->recalc_wq = alloc_workqueue("dm-integrity-recalc", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
 		if (!ic->recalc_wq ) {
 			ti->error = "Cannot allocate workqueue";
@@ -4245,8 +4246,10 @@ try_smaller_buffer:
 			r = -ENOMEM;
 			goto bad;
 		}
-		ic->recalc_tags = kvmalloc_array(RECALC_SECTORS >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block,
-						 ic->tag_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		recalc_tags_size = (RECALC_SECTORS >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block) * ic->tag_size;
+		if (crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash) > ic->tag_size)
+			recalc_tags_size += crypto_shash_digestsize(ic->internal_hash) - ic->tag_size;
+		ic->recalc_tags = kvmalloc(recalc_tags_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!ic->recalc_tags) {
 			ti->error = "Cannot allocate tags for recalculating";
 			r = -ENOMEM;