Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933330AbXEEUwh (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 16:52:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933354AbXEEUwh (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 16:52:37 -0400 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:39782 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933330AbXEEUwg (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 May 2007 16:52:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 22:50:05 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3_Bilski?= cc: Wander Winkelhorst , David Johnson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up In-Reply-To: <463CE1FB.4050305@interia.pl> Message-ID: References: <200705042320.41278.dj@david-web.co.uk> <463C18C4.7030304@interia.pl> <5699f8f00705050144s5c00a455s8f7dba9258d83986@mail.gmail.com> <463CC380.3060603@interia.pl> <463CE1FB.4050305@interia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 4.0 points, 6.0 required 4.0 HOT_NASTY BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 689 Lines: 21 On May 5 2007 21:58, Rafał Bilski wrote: >:-/ Weird. Nothing new in datasheet. Longhaul MSR seems to be OK too. >Would be good to check if PLL really can go downto x4,0. Can You >limit minimal CPU multiplier to 5,0 and check if is stable? If it >is check 4,5. I directly wrote to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq, which worked better than `cpufreq -u xxx -d xxx`. Lockup after 9 minutes. (Perhaps the longest time so far.) Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/