Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/highmem: Fix kernel-doc warnings in highmem*.h
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:09:04 +0200
Message-ID: <6767543.18pcnM708K@leap>
In-Reply-To: <Yl7MpmsXtzOfztHu@iweiny-desk3>
References: <20220418175638.30018-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> <4058661.1IzOArtZ34@leap> <Yl7MpmsXtzOfztHu@iweiny-desk3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Precedence: bulk

On marted=C3=AC 19 aprile 2022 16:52:22 CEST Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 03:25:16PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
>
> [snip]
>=20
> I think you should gather all these patches together into a series and=20
submit.
> If I am following correctly there are at least 4 patches now?  But I'm=20
unsure
> of which ones are stand alone.
>=20
> It would be easier to see what changes are being made along the way as=20
well as
> the final result of the fixes.
>=20
> Ira

Yes, this is perfectly reasonable. There are only three patches (this patch=
=20
plus two more in a series). Since they are all related in some way, it is=20
best to bring them together into one series which I will rework taking into=
=20
account both yours and Matthew's suggestions.

Thanks,

=46abio