Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/highmem: Fix kernel-doc warnings in highmem*.h
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:13:06 +0200
Message-ID: <2147048.ZfL8zNpBrT@leap>
In-Reply-To: <6767543.18pcnM708K@leap>
References: <20220418175638.30018-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> <Yl7MpmsXtzOfztHu@iweiny-desk3> <6767543.18pcnM708K@leap>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Precedence: bulk

On marted=C3=AC 19 aprile 2022 17:09:04 CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On marted=C3=AC 19 aprile 2022 16:52:22 CEST Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 03:25:16PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >=20
> > I think you should gather all these patches together into a series and=
=20
> submit.
> > If I am following correctly there are at least 4 patches now?  But I'm=
=20
> unsure
> > of which ones are stand alone.
> >=20
> > It would be easier to see what changes are being made along the way as=
=20
> well as
> > the final result of the fixes.
> >=20
> > Ira
>=20
> Yes, this is perfectly reasonable. There are only three patches (this=20
patch=20
> plus two more in a series).=20

No, you are right. There are 4 patches in my queue for Highmem related=20
files. I think I'm at a point where I'm starting to lose sight of the tasks=
=20
due :(

> Since they are all related in some way, it is=20
> best to bring them together into one series which I will rework taking=20
into=20
> account both yours and Matthew's suggestions.

The collection of all these patches in one series is confirmed for all 4.

Thanks,

=46abio