Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:06:18 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "D. Starke" <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
Cc:     linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] tty: n_gsm: clean up dead code in gsm_queue()
Message-ID: <Yl6Jmk/j7go9s+0i@kroah.com>
References: <YlkRO6fAPCuWyT1Y@kroah.com>
 <20220419081713.5813-1-daniel.starke@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220419081713.5813-1-daniel.starke@siemens.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 01:17:13AM -0700, D. Starke wrote:
> From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
> 
> Remove commented out code as it is never used and if anyone accidentally
> turned it on, it would be broken.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index 07d03447cdfd..1b4077006744 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -1894,10 +1894,6 @@ static void gsm_queue(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
>  	case UI|PF:
>  	case UIH:
>  	case UIH|PF:
> -#if 0
> -		if (cr)
> -			goto invalid;
> -#endif
>  		if (dlci == NULL || dlci->state != DLCI_OPEN) {
>  			gsm_command(gsm, address, DM|PF);
>  			return;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
  here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot