Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:15:34 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@gmail.com>
Cc:     Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org>, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org,
        greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy@lists.linux.dev,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: greybus: remove empty callback function
Message-ID: <YmAjliv4DdTY+JvZ@kroah.com>
References: <cover.1649824370.git.jhpark1013@gmail.com>
 <12037ae2502ad7d0311bcdf2178c3d2156293236.1649824370.git.jhpark1013@gmail.com>
 <a4e5c567-63dd-f7de-114b-a357075444a2@ieee.org>
 <20220414200932.GA4147124@jaehee-ThinkPad-X1-Extreme>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220414200932.GA4147124@jaehee-ThinkPad-X1-Extreme>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 04:09:32PM -0400, Jaehee Park wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 07:48:03AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > On 4/12/22 11:38 PM, Jaehee Park wrote:
> > > Remove the optional remove callback for the soc_codec_dev_gbaudio
> > > structure. The only place it is referenced is
> > > snd_soc_component_remove() which is only called if the sound_component
> > > pointer is non-null. The null function pointers here can be optionally
> > > ommitted. When a sound component is registered this way, the remove
> > > callback is optional. We can safely remove the whole gbcodec_remove
> > > function, which used to be an empty function with a void return type.
> > 
> > Now I think your description is a little long...  But that's OK.
> > 
> > This looks good to me.  Thank you for responding to all our
> > feedback.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> 
> hi Greg, I saw that this was past on to staging-next already. Is it too 
> late to add Alex to the reviewed by? 

Yes, sorry.