Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750888AbXEFWrf (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 18:47:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751366AbXEFWrf (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 18:47:35 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:52218 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750888AbXEFWre (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 May 2007 18:47:34 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G3wE9Q1QpVFZ2jUJmgP7NddvvOunC+LCy/3p303dHP4ASbJ4cl6/H0UapF8QsSMbk+7N+AH2U5FcHgK+lTe+CV8zVR0V/FLJeKI2fAtwVBvtATk/TMsMx+qzV7uCe6+44/apEC/ssNW61xE5xeYae3Rp8DEFF4aDHfeB8A0GW6A= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:47:32 -0700 From: "Dan Williams" To: "Wim Van Sebroeck" Subject: Re: [2.6.22 patch] iop: combined watchdog timer driver for iop3xx and iop13xx Cc: "Curt E. Bruns" , "Peter Milne" , "Russell King" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lennert Buytenhek" In-Reply-To: <20070506205320.GA6486@infomag.infomag.iguana.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1177952240.12134.10.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> <20070506095256.GA2521@infomag.infomag.iguana.be> <20070506205320.GA6486@infomag.infomag.iguana.be> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1282 Lines: 35 On 5/6/07, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > >Could you split this patch into 2 patches: one that deals with the moving > > >of > > >the architecture dependant code (and explaining why) and one with the new > > >watchdog drivers? I will continue my review today. > > > > > > > I am one of the maintainers of this architecture, (Lennert Buytenhek > > is the other). I will go ahead and split this up so you can sign-off > > on the watchdog specific bits. The intent is to move all hardware > > definitions under #include . You are right this > > should have been a separate patch. > > I reviewed the rest of the code. Looks OK to me. One small remark though: > Can we change the ifdef's in the code as described in section 2 point 2 of > the Documentation/SubmittingPatches document? > Ok, I can add this cleanup. Barring any objections I'll go ahead and submit the revised patch with an "Acked-by: Wim Van Sebroeck " to Russell's ARM patch tracker. > Thanks, > Wim. > Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/