Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753906AbXEGEqN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 00:46:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753913AbXEGEqN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 00:46:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:49732 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753906AbXEGEqM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 00:46:12 -0400 Message-ID: <463EB169.8030701@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 00:56:09 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070130) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Drepper CC: Nick Piggin , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: [PATCH] MM: implement MADV_FREE lazy freeing of anonymous memory References: <4632D0EF.9050701@redhat.com> <463B108C.10602@yahoo.com.au> <463B598B.80200@redhat.com> <463BC62C.3060605@yahoo.com.au> <463E5A00.6070708@redhat.com> <463E921D.3070407@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <463E921D.3070407@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 859 Lines: 20 Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: >> I think that maybe for 2.6.22 we should just alias MADV_FREE >> to run with the MADV_DONTNEED functionality, so that the glibc >> people can make the change on their side while we figure out >> what will be the best thing to do on the kernel side. > > No need for that. We can later extend glibc to use MADV_FREE and fall > back on MADV_DONTNEED. It's trivial to merge the MADV_FREE #defines into the kernel though, and aliasing MADV_FREE to MADV_DONTNEED for the time being is a one-liner - just an extra constant into the big switch statement in sys_madvise(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/