Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220413092206.73974-1-jvgediya@linux.ibm.com> <20220413092206.73974-3-jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220413092206.73974-3-jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>
From:   Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 21:33:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAPL-u_xWwjJBoRE8Ce_oRFmmFHQ0DWTNn03zvPxX8HgtTrcWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: demotion: Add new node state N_DEMOTION_TARGETS
To:     Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc:     Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:22 AM Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Current implementation to find the demotion targets works
> based on node state N_MEMORY, however some systems may have
> dram only memory numa node which are N_MEMORY but not the
> right choices as demotion targets.
>
> Add new state N_DEMOTION_TARGETS, node_states[N_DEMOTION_TARGETS]
> then can be used to hold the list of nodes which can be used
> as demotion targets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/node.c      | 4 ++++
>  include/linux/nodemask.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index ec8bb24a5a22..cd79815b0f7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -1038,6 +1038,9 @@ static struct node_attr node_state_attr[] = {
>         [N_CPU] = _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU),
>         [N_GENERIC_INITIATOR] = _NODE_ATTR(has_generic_initiator,
>                                            N_GENERIC_INITIATOR),
> +       [N_DEMOTION_TARGETS] = _NODE_ATTR(has_demotion_targets,
> +                                         N_DEMOTION_TARGETS),

These nodes are demotion targets themselves. It is not the case that
they have demotion targets. Let's rename "has_demotion_targets" to
"demotion_targets"?

> +
>  };
>
>  static struct attribute *node_state_attrs[] = {
> @@ -1050,6 +1053,7 @@ static struct attribute *node_state_attrs[] = {
>         &node_state_attr[N_MEMORY].attr.attr,
>         &node_state_attr[N_CPU].attr.attr,
>         &node_state_attr[N_GENERIC_INITIATOR].attr.attr,
> +       &node_state_attr[N_DEMOTION_TARGETS].attr.attr,
>         NULL
>  };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/nodemask.h b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> index 567c3ddba2c4..17844300fd57 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nodemask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nodemask.h
> @@ -400,6 +400,7 @@ enum node_states {
>         N_MEMORY,               /* The node has memory(regular, high, movable) */
>         N_CPU,          /* The node has one or more cpus */
>         N_GENERIC_INITIATOR,    /* The node has one or more Generic Initiators */
> +       N_DEMOTION_TARGETS,     /* Nodes that should be considered as demotion targets */
>         NR_NODE_STATES
>  };
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
>