Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
        Bruno Moreira-Guedes <codeagain@codeagain.dev>
Cc:     linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        outreachy@lists.linux.dev,
        Bruno's Patch Watchbox <patch-reply@codeagain.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Docs: Update information at changes.rst
In-Reply-To: <2f4c72d2-4669-4217-f322-9d4f34c3053e@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1650376049.git.codeagain@codeagain.dev>
 <8735i83xo1.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <20220420172731.ru7kfrdkmprybtu7@AN5Bruno>
 <878rrz30d9.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
 <2f4c72d2-4669-4217-f322-9d4f34c3053e@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 02:09:31 -0600
Message-ID: <874k2m3lj8.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> On 4/21/22 04:34, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>> Thanks, Jon! I have also been thinking whether this filename
>>> ('changes.rst') is a good description of the file contents. Do you think
>>> renaming it to something like 'requirements.rst' and updating its
>>> references would be a good patch?
>> 
>> It's best not to rename things unnecessarily, especially relatively
>> well-known files that a lot of people expect to find in a specific
>> place.  We've done a lot of renaming over the last few years, but this
>> is one I might let slide for now.
>> 
>
> Did you mean the rename will be benefical?

No, I would not do the rename at this time.

jon