Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:13:00 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     hch@lst.de, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
        arnd@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] More ARM DMA ops cleanup
Message-ID: <20220421141300.GC20492@lst.de>
References: <cover.1650539846.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <cover.1650539846.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Thanks to Christoph's latest series, I'm reminded that, if we're going
> to give the ARM DMA ops some cleanup this cycle, it's as good a time as
> any to dust off these old patches and add them on top as well. I've
> based these on the arm-dma-direct branch which I assume matches the
> patches posted at [1].

All these do look sensible to me.  But weren't you working on replacing
the ARM iommu dma_ops with dma-іommu anyway?