Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Bruno Moreira-Guedes <codeagain@codeagain.dev>
Cc:     linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        outreachy@lists.linux.dev,
        Bruno's Patch Watchbox <patch-reply@codeagain.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Docs: Update information at changes.rst
In-Reply-To: <20220420172731.ru7kfrdkmprybtu7@AN5Bruno>
References: <cover.1650376049.git.codeagain@codeagain.dev>
 <8735i83xo1.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <20220420172731.ru7kfrdkmprybtu7@AN5Bruno>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:34:26 -0600
Message-ID: <878rrz30d9.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Bruno Moreira-Guedes <codeagain@codeagain.dev> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:35:10AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Bruno Moreira-Guedes <codeagain@codeagain.dev> writes:
>> >
>> > The PATCH 1/2 fixes the missing cpio requirement, while PATCH 2/2 fixes
>> > the kernel version reference.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bruno Moreira-Guedes <codeagain@codeagain.dev>
>> 
>> Patches applied, thanks.
> Thanks, Jon! I have also been thinking whether this filename
> ('changes.rst') is a good description of the file contents. Do you think
> renaming it to something like 'requirements.rst' and updating its
> references would be a good patch?

It's best not to rename things unnecessarily, especially relatively
well-known files that a lot of people expect to find in a specific
place.  We've done a lot of renaming over the last few years, but this
is one I might let slide for now.

Thanks,

jon