Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:49:43 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de,
        bigeasy@linutronix.de, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ptrace: Don't change __state
Message-ID: <20220421104914.GA20402@redhat.com>
References: <YlikBjA3kL3XEQP5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20220415101644.GA10421@redhat.com>
 <20220415105755.GA15217@redhat.com>
 <Yllep6B8eva2VURJ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20220418170104.GA16199@redhat.com>
 <20220420131731.GF2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20220420180323.GA14947@redhat.com>
 <875yn3zdag.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
 <20220421072138.GI2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20220421102631.GE2762@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220421102631.GE2762@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk

On 04/21, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> As such, I've taken the liberty of munging yours and Oleg's approach
> together. I've yet to actually test this but it looks feasible.

Agreed, but I am a but confused. Is it on top of 1/5? Doesn't look so,
and I can't apply it with or without 1/5. So I am not sure I understand
what exactly it does.

Oleg.