Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:50:44 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc:     David Vernet <void@manifault.com>, lizefan.x@bytedance.com,
        hannes@cmpxchg.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup: Introduce cpu controller test suite
Message-ID: <20220422175044.GX2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20220422173349.3394844-1-void@manifault.com>
 <YmLqdIiXdpQqcPTd@slm.duckdns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YmLqdIiXdpQqcPTd@slm.duckdns.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:48:36AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, David.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:33:47AM -0700, David Vernet wrote:
> > This patchset introduces a new test_cpu.c test suite as part of
> > tools/testing/selftests/cgroup. test_cpu.c will contain testcases that
> > validate the cgroup v2 cpu controller.
> > 
> > This patchset only contains testcases that validate cpu.stat and
> > cpu.weight, but I'm expecting to send further patchsets after this that
> > also include testcases that validate other knobs such as cpu.max.
> > 
> > Note that checkpatch complains about a missing MAINTAINERS file entry for
> > [PATCH 1/4], but Roman Gushchin added that entry in a separate patchset:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220415000133.3955987-4-roman.gushchin@linux.dev/.
> 
> Looks great to me. Thanks for adding the much needed selftests. Peter, if
> you're okay with it, imma route it through the cgroup tree.

Sure, have at. Thanks!