Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6d10:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gq16csp1034464pxb; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:26:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtZ0sFtRAHZIC1h4RIK/ac4gkrS5tBFECHp1xmzDsqGSidxRcLIe2wsGJIKIPwfVHx7G8W X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:130c:b0:4bd:118:8071 with SMTP id j12-20020a056a00130c00b004bd01188071mr7740981pfu.28.1650673598587; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:26:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1650673598; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mU9JpKz++pvWu92ublWyMhvqTtwGXND7PKL8VMUU1enX1ZnzA9jrgTv8Yan8SRzbEz T8rLWEWjWWhwl+4ZSJEHNli3fq2Anriv6kkuOTjlVRlQTjMf4FNXe9hAdap5cb9CBhoL jeTt+lRIS+/ZOu9WMfYxwd6/eQ6uwiIse12Dg3zTR5i7MSj6brp+WywEzcWHS0aUiFeL MrBk3IeXUQkqP4DL/jlkjCvRzo7nEOA/vxqWejme9JHyc/11Jw2UQICybgnzbGjErbyb BKDYOaOLjWhvOSebbAxmiU5pdW4+xUtImCfL938kTz5llpU13olJkpCE0MLLtY7/j/YP Rw9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:date; bh=YMfzDL5JA0cUmzPiRnDBwSelMHWpmqS+/mHuZZauqFM=; b=s8D9jVk4EdyDyb1Yn9gWsHAWD0QTSwnFi5bK0+8nzaAjR6QJnoN+1dymWbktk44fkX Gy86xJmyKVXDmIvfQ/+DDR6cmqpJ2RXbAoacY2ZKPltG8vRMcIF1Ub34Ypxf9KUSqpPN nhFAm6/M/NqbTOlKFPVQoPynKcrVvPEWhmCCrxLvzgbD+QK+p755Yy3h2GYrFBaXU7Fp N53aONphyGlBt1R5x2dgegPwZQrEHa8GrKI1tQ1RwGorUC5Uzj4tEYqUq3OinLVzwVFd 85/k8yDzqwYw0+s+ZCbCFw/05f++jGHND7XqVrjBi28WOtBk8HgoHQGRL4KHE4zvUAp5 CX0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=a+wi3HYi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.dev Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [2620:137:e000::1:18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11-20020a17090301cb00b00153b2d1661esi378035plh.550.2022.04.22.17.26.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=a+wi3HYi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.dev Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6716F8119D; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:53:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231358AbiDVXxe (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:53:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56300 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230373AbiDVXx1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:53:27 -0400 Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [91.121.223.63]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612521384AC; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:50:12 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1650671417; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YMfzDL5JA0cUmzPiRnDBwSelMHWpmqS+/mHuZZauqFM=; b=a+wi3HYiqinXhmAX1F9VwZBpjFQJL0pEqfkuYWeOMEbit0scO0zBp35fOMYk8PD20VerZ5 lumIWn3vCbVEP5N/z551GXFlgE+D5hka3VN93XUFQK1IT3xwVd6YYdtf7IuZbb095kD4Mu j4o406/OQtOcmMxu4SB1znE57WD+Apk= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Roman Gushchin To: David Vernet Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] cgroup: Removing racy check in test_memcg_sock() Message-ID: References: <20220422155728.3055914-1-void@manifault.com> <20220422155728.3055914-5-void@manifault.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220422155728.3055914-5-void@manifault.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: linux.dev X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 08:57:28AM -0700, David Vernet wrote: > test_memcg_sock() in the cgroup memcg tests, verifies expected memory > accounting for sockets. The test forks a process which functions as a TCP > server, and sends large buffers back and forth between itself (as the TCP > client) and the forked TCP server. While doing so, it verifies that > memory.current and memory.stat.sock look correct. > > There is currently a check in tcp_client() which asserts memory.current >= > memory.stat.sock. This check is racy, as between memory.current and > memory.stat.sock being queried, a packet could come in which causes > mem_cgroup_charge_skmem() to be invoked. This could cause memory.stat.sock > to exceed memory.current. Reversing the order of querying doesn't address > the problem either, as memory may be reclaimed between the two calls. But just curious, does it fix the flakiness (assuming there is no memory pressure)? > Instead, this patch just removes that assertion altogether, and instead > relies on the values_close() check that follows to validate the expected > accounting. Acked-by: Roman Gushchin