Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 23 Apr 2022 09:14:53 +0000
From:   Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@xilinx.com>,
        Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@xilinx.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        qperret@google.com, will@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH  v2 2/2] misc: Add a mechanism to detect stalls on guest
 vCPUs
Message-ID: <YmPDjWK5X1O3HQvk@google.com>
References: <20220422141949.3456505-1-sebastianene@google.com>
 <20220422141949.3456505-3-sebastianene@google.com>
 <YmOhmzmBL36rBO30@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YmOhmzmBL36rBO30@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 08:50:03AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 02:19:50PM +0000, Sebastian Ene wrote:

Hello Greg,

> > This patch adds support for a virtual watchdog which relies on the
> > per-cpu hrtimers to pet at regular intervals.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/misc/Kconfig  |   8 ++
> >  drivers/misc/Makefile |   1 +
> >  drivers/misc/vm-wdt.c | 215 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 224 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/misc/vm-wdt.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > index 2b9572a6d114..0e710149ff95 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > @@ -493,6 +493,14 @@ config OPEN_DICE
> >  
> >  	  If unsure, say N.
> >  
> > +config VM_WATCHDOG
> > +	tristate "Virtual Machine Watchdog"
> > +	select LOCKUP_DETECTOR
> > +	help
> > +	  Detect CPU locks on the virtual machine.
> > +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> > +	  module will be called vm-wdt.
> > +
> >  source "drivers/misc/c2port/Kconfig"
> >  source "drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig"
> >  source "drivers/misc/cb710/Kconfig"
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > index 2ec634354cf5..868e28d01b75 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > @@ -59,3 +59,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_SDFEC)	+= xilinx_sdfec.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_HIKEY_USB)	+= hisi_hikey_usb.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_UID_SYS_STATS)	+= uid_sys_stats.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_OPEN_DICE)		+= open-dice.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_VM_WATCHDOG) += vm-wdt.o
> 
> No tab?
> 

I will add one.

> > \ No newline at end of file
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/vm-wdt.c b/drivers/misc/vm-wdt.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..ea4351754645
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/vm-wdt.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> 
> I have to ask, do you really mean "+" here as this is not the overall
> license of the kernel.  It's not a normal license for your employer to
> pick, so as long as you have legal approval, it's fine, but if not, you
> need to get that.
> 

Thanks for letting me know, I think this should be :
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 without "+".

> > +//
> > +// Virtual watchdog driver.
> > +//  Copyright (C) Google, 2022
> > +
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "vm-watchdog: " fmt
> 
> It's a driver, you shouldn't need any pr_* calls.
>

I will remove those.

> > +
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/nmi.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/param.h>
> > +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +#define DRV_NAME			"vm_wdt"
> 
> KBUILD_MODNAME?
> 
> > +#define DRV_VERSION			"1.0"
> 
> "versions" mean nothing once the code is in the kernel, please drop
> this.
> 

I will drop this.

> But why isn't this in the normal watchdog subdirectory?  Why is this a
> special driver?
> 
> > +
> > +#define VMWDT_REG_STATUS		(0x00)
> > +#define VMWDT_REG_LOAD_CNT		(0x04)
> > +#define VMWDT_REG_CURRENT_CNT		(0x08)
> > +#define VMWDT_REG_CLOCK_FREQ_HZ		(0x0C)
> > +#define VMWDT_REG_LEN			(0x10)
> > +
> > +#define VMWDT_DEFAULT_CLOCK_HZ		(10)
> > +#define VMWDT_DEFAULT_TIMEOT_SEC	(8)
> > +
> > +struct vm_wdt_s {
> > +	void __iomem *membase;
> > +	u32 clock_freq;
> > +	u32 expiration_sec;
> > +	u32 ping_timeout_ms;
> > +	struct hrtimer per_cpu_hrtimer;
> > +	struct platform_device *dev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define vmwdt_reg_write(wdt, reg, value)	\
> > +	iowrite32((value), (wdt)->membase + (reg))
> > +#define vmwdt_reg_read(wdt, reg)		\
> > +	io32read((wdt)->membase + (reg))
> > +
> > +static struct platform_device *virt_dev;
> > +
> > +static enum hrtimer_restart vmwdt_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
> > +{
> > +	struct vm_wdt_s *cpu_wdt;
> > +	u32 ticks;
> > +
> > +	cpu_wdt = container_of(hrtimer, struct vm_wdt_s, per_cpu_hrtimer);
> > +	ticks = cpu_wdt->clock_freq * cpu_wdt->expiration_sec;
> > +	vmwdt_reg_write(cpu_wdt, VMWDT_REG_LOAD_CNT, ticks);
> > +	hrtimer_forward_now(hrtimer, ms_to_ktime(cpu_wdt->ping_timeout_ms));
> > +
> > +	return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vmwdt_start(void *arg)
> > +{
> > +	u32 ticks;
> > +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > +	struct vm_wdt_s *cpu_wdt = arg;
> > +	struct hrtimer *hrtimer = &cpu_wdt->per_cpu_hrtimer;
> > +
> > +	pr_info("cpu %u vmwdt start\n", cpu);
> 
> When drivers work properly, they are quiet.
> 

I will drop this.

> Again, why not have this in drivers/watchdog/ and use the apis there
> instead of creating a custom one for no reason?
> 

I submitted this patch to the drivers/watchdog and I received some
feedback on it stating that this type of driver is not intended to be
used with watchdog core, because the drivers don't have a notion of
CPU. Moreover, we need to keep track of the elapsed time on a per-cpu
basis and the core watchdog framework doesn't provide this
functionality.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thanks,
Sebastian