Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cgroups: Refactor children cgroups in memcg tests
From:   Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
In-Reply-To: <20220423113037.gnfysktiuzmfnpmp@dev0025.ash9.facebook.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:19:12 -0700
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
        shakeelb@google.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Message-Id: <EEC47283-0467-4C97-AAB2-73F17A97CE15@linux.dev>
References: <20220423113037.gnfysktiuzmfnpmp@dev0025.ash9.facebook.com>
To:     David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Precedence: bulk


> On Apr 23, 2022, at 4:30 AM, David Vernet <void@manifault.com> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFOn Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 04:04:15PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>>=20
>=20
> Thanks for the reviews on this patchset, Roman. FYI I think Andrew already=

> merged these patches to the -mm tree. I'll send out a follow-on patch that=

> fixes everything you pointed out, both here and on the other patches in th=
e
> set.

The mm tree isn=E2=80=99t a git tree, but a collection of the text patches, m=
anaged by Andrew. So you can send a new version and Andrew can update it in p=
lace. It=E2=80=99s happening all the time: mostly for adding reviewed-by/ack=
ed-by tags etc, but for code updates as well.
It=E2=80=99s not uncommon for some patchset to mature while being in the mm t=
ree, this allows to include them into linux-next and give some more testing,=
 but without doing many reverts/fixups (Andrew is often squashing fixups int=
o the original patch too). So long story short, you can just send a new vers=
ion, especially because all changes all minor.

Thanks!=