Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:25:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:24:58 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:33785 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:24:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:24:35 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ahmed Masud , "'lkml'" Subject: Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 Message-ID: <20011127132435.G9391@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , Ahmed Masud , 'lkml' In-Reply-To: <000901c17723$b641c990$8604a8c0@googgun.com> <3C03C96D.B3ACA982@zip.com.au>, <3C03C96D.B3ACA982@zip.com.au> <20011127123128.E9391@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <3C03FE2F.63D7ACFD@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C03FE2F.63D7ACFD@zip.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:57:19PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > > I'll send you a patch which makes the VM less inclined to page things > > > out in the presence of heavy writes, and which decreases read > > > latencies. > > > > > Is this patch posted anywhere? > > I sent it yesterday, in this thread. Here it is again. > Yep, saw it. I didn't realize (didn't read patch) that it modified the VM swapping. > Description: > > - Account for locked as well as dirty buffers when deciding > to throttle writers. > > - Tweak VM to make it work the inactive list harder, before starting > to evict pages or swap. > > - Change the elevator so that once a request's latency has > expired, we can still perform merges in front of that > request. But we no longer will insert new requests in > front of that request. > > - Modify elevator so that new read requests do not have > more than N write requests placed in front of them, where > N is tunable per-device with `elvtune -b'. > > Theoretically, the last change needs significant alterations > to the readhead code. But a rewrite of readhead made negligible > difference (I wasn't able to trigger the failure scenario). > Still crunching on this. > Sounds great. I'll test it out. MF - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/