Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965509AbXEHI4g (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 04:56:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934736AbXEHI4f (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 04:56:35 -0400 Received: from mail.syneticon.net ([213.239.212.131]:41510 "EHLO mail2.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934730AbXEHI4e (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 04:56:34 -0400 Message-ID: <46403AF3.9000300@wpkg.org> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 10:55:15 +0200 From: Tomasz Chmielewski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061110 Mandriva/1.5.0.8-1mdv2007.1 (2007.1) Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Zaytsev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michael Jones , Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS References: <464034CF.20700@wpkg.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1588 Lines: 44 Alexey Zaytsev schrieb: > On 5/8/07, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> Michael Jones wrote: >> >> >> +#ifndef __ARMEB__ >> >> +#warning Little endian mode not supported >> >> +#endif >> > >> > Personally I'm less fussed about WAN / LE support. Anyone with any >> > sense will run ixp4xx boards doing such a specialised network >> > operation as BE. Also, NSLU2-Linux can't test this functionality with >> > our LE setup as we don't have this hardware on-board. You may just >> > want to declare a depends on ARMEB in Kconfig (with or without OR >> > (ARM || BROKEN) ) and have done with it - it's up to you. >> >> Christian Hohnstaedt's work did support LE though. >> >> Not all ixp4xx boards are by definition "doing such a specialised >> network operation". >> > > I was always curious, why do people want to run ixp4xx in LE mode? What > are the benefits that overweight the obvious performance degradation? I guess the main reason, at least for me, is that there is only one distro that properly supports LE ARM: Debian. It greatly simplifies management/administration of a higher number of devices, given the fact that Debian also supports other architectures (not just x86/64, sometimes PPC, like most distros do). Not always network performance is to most important factor. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/