Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966436AbXEHKVs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 06:21:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934637AbXEHKVq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 06:21:46 -0400 Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:47214 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934633AbXEHKVq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 06:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: <46404EC4.4010303@trash.net> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:19:48 +0200 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051019) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Michal Piotrowski , LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.21-git8+ BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU1 References: <46403642.7020501@googlemail.com> <20070508030701.d21dc40b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070508030701.d21dc40b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 735 Lines: 17 Andrew Morton wrote: > Whatever happens, that printk should be toned down, shouldn't it? We > prefer to not let unprivileged apps spam the logs. Only priviledged apps can send these packets. I've never seen it in practice except for one case that was a bug in the network stack, so I'd prefer to keep it. The original intention was to give the user a hint why these packets are not affected by iptables rules, so a more descriptive message would make sense. I'll queue a patch for this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/