Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:50:37 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To:     "Andrea Parri (Microsoft)" <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc:     KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
        Wei Hu <weh@microsoft.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@linux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: hv: Use vmbus_requestor to generate
 transaction IDs for VMbus hardening
Message-ID: <20220425165037.GA17718@lpieralisi>
References: <20220419122325.10078-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com>
 <20220419122325.10078-3-parri.andrea@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220419122325.10078-3-parri.andrea@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 02:23:21PM +0200, Andrea Parri (Microsoft) wrote:
> Currently, pointers to guest memory are passed to Hyper-V as transaction
> IDs in hv_pci.  In the face of errors or malicious behavior in Hyper-V,
> hv_pci should not expose or trust the transaction IDs returned by
> Hyper-V to be valid guest memory addresses.  Instead, use small integers
> generated by vmbus_requestor as request (transaction) IDs.
> 
> Suggested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index 88b3b56d05228..0252b4bbc8d15 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,13 @@ static enum pci_protocol_version_t pci_protocol_versions[] = {
>  /* space for 32bit serial number as string */
>  #define SLOT_NAME_SIZE 11
>  
> +/*
> + * Size of requestor for VMbus; the value is based on the observation
> + * that having more than one request outstanding is 'rare', and so 64
> + * should be generous in ensuring that we don't ever run out.
> + */
> +#define HV_PCI_RQSTOR_SIZE 64
> +
>  /*
>   * Message Types
>   */
> @@ -1407,7 +1414,7 @@ static void hv_int_desc_free(struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev,
>  	int_pkt->wslot.slot = hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot;
>  	int_pkt->int_desc = *int_desc;
>  	vmbus_sendpacket(hpdev->hbus->hdev->channel, int_pkt, sizeof(*int_pkt),
> -			 (unsigned long)&ctxt.pkt, VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
> +			 0, VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
>  	kfree(int_desc);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2649,7 +2656,7 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	ejct_pkt->message_type.type = PCI_EJECTION_COMPLETE;
>  	ejct_pkt->wslot.slot = hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot;
>  	vmbus_sendpacket(hbus->hdev->channel, ejct_pkt,
> -			 sizeof(*ejct_pkt), (unsigned long)&ctxt.pkt,
> +			 sizeof(*ejct_pkt), 0,
>  			 VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
>  
>  	/* For the get_pcichild() in hv_pci_eject_device() */
> @@ -2696,8 +2703,9 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void *context)
>  	const int packet_size = 0x100;
>  	int ret;
>  	struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus = context;
> +	struct vmbus_channel *chan = hbus->hdev->channel;
>  	u32 bytes_recvd;
> -	u64 req_id;
> +	u64 req_id, req_addr;
>  	struct vmpacket_descriptor *desc;
>  	unsigned char *buffer;
>  	int bufferlen = packet_size;
> @@ -2715,8 +2723,8 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void *context)
>  		return;
>  
>  	while (1) {
> -		ret = vmbus_recvpacket_raw(hbus->hdev->channel, buffer,
> -					   bufferlen, &bytes_recvd, &req_id);
> +		ret = vmbus_recvpacket_raw(chan, buffer, bufferlen,
> +					   &bytes_recvd, &req_id);
>  
>  		if (ret == -ENOBUFS) {
>  			kfree(buffer);
> @@ -2743,11 +2751,14 @@ static void hv_pci_onchannelcallback(void *context)
>  		switch (desc->type) {
>  		case VM_PKT_COMP:
>  
> -			/*
> -			 * The host is trusted, and thus it's safe to interpret
> -			 * this transaction ID as a pointer.
> -			 */
> -			comp_packet = (struct pci_packet *)req_id;
> +			req_addr = chan->request_addr_callback(chan, req_id);
> +			if (req_addr == VMBUS_RQST_ERROR) {
> +				dev_err(&hbus->hdev->device,
> +					"Invalid transaction ID %llx\n",
> +					req_id);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			comp_packet = (struct pci_packet *)req_addr;
>  			response = (struct pci_response *)buffer;
>  			comp_packet->completion_func(comp_packet->compl_ctxt,
>  						     response,
> @@ -3428,6 +3439,10 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
>  		goto free_dom;
>  	}
>  
> +	hdev->channel->next_request_id_callback = vmbus_next_request_id;
> +	hdev->channel->request_addr_callback = vmbus_request_addr;
> +	hdev->channel->rqstor_size = HV_PCI_RQSTOR_SIZE;
> +
>  	ret = vmbus_open(hdev->channel, pci_ring_size, pci_ring_size, NULL, 0,
>  			 hv_pci_onchannelcallback, hbus);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -3758,6 +3773,10 @@ static int hv_pci_resume(struct hv_device *hdev)
>  
>  	hbus->state = hv_pcibus_init;
>  
> +	hdev->channel->next_request_id_callback = vmbus_next_request_id;
> +	hdev->channel->request_addr_callback = vmbus_request_addr;
> +	hdev->channel->rqstor_size = HV_PCI_RQSTOR_SIZE;
> +
>  	ret = vmbus_open(hdev->channel, pci_ring_size, pci_ring_size, NULL, 0,
>  			 hv_pci_onchannelcallback, hbus);
>  	if (ret)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>