Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968135AbXEHPcu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 11:32:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755166AbXEHPYi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 11:24:38 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:41519 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966388AbXEHPRe (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 11:17:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:17:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Russell King cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel List , Prarit Bhargava , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Please revert 86c0baf123e474b6eb404798926ecf62b426bf3a In-Reply-To: <20070508134928.GA13212@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20070508134928.GA13212@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 669 Lines: 18 On Tue, 8 May 2007, Russell King wrote: > > Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are > the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly? I can certainly revert the patch, but it would probably be better if you were to just start adding the infrastructure you need and send it as a new patch instead (where the revert is part of it, and the __CPUINIT is additional). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/