Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968191AbXEHPc5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 11:32:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966388AbXEHPYm (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 11:24:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33293 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966423AbXEHPUL (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 11:20:11 -0400 Message-ID: <46409512.5000502@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 11:19:46 -0400 From: Prarit Bhargava User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Russell King , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel List , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Please revert 86c0baf123e474b6eb404798926ecf62b426bf3a References: <20070508134928.GA13212@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 830 Lines: 28 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2007, Russell King wrote: > >> Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are >> the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly? >> > > I can certainly revert the patch, but it would probably be better if you > were to just start adding the infrastructure you need and send it as a new > patch instead (where the revert is part of it, and the __CPUINIT is > additional). > > I've sent Russell a new patch to test off-list. He or I will submit a fix here after he tests. P. > Linus > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/