Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:57:26 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
        Julius Hemanth Pitti <jpitti@cisco.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lkp@lists.01.org,
        lkp@intel.com, Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [proc/sysctl]  1dd38979b2:
 BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address
Message-ID: <Ymc1Zn8BbQMbjb58@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20220425083302.GD21864@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
 <YmbvxQVNFESRwxxU@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <20220425144607.2c2588e6b1f00ab8a6f3f6ea@linux-foundation.org>
 <YmcqCVLv3HQ+Kxeq@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <20220425163434.5f8f47e8c301ea30c2f94a5a@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220425163434.5f8f47e8c301ea30c2f94a5a@linux-foundation.org>
Sender: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:34:34PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:08:57 -0700 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 02:46:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 12:00:21 -0700 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Andrew, can we drop this patch for now?
> > > 
> > > I've been sitting on (ie, forgotten about) this patch
> > > (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200709235115.56954-1-jpitti@cisco.com/T/#u)
> > 
> > Jesh, yeah I see.
> > 
> > > for two years.  Evidently waiting for you/Kees/Ingo to provide
> > > guidance.  So sure, the need seems very unurgent so I can drop it.
> > 
> > Well Keew as OK with it, but I yeah I can't decipher the issue at this
> > point in time.
> > 
> > > However I fail to see how that patch could have caused this crash.  I'm
> > > suspecting a bisection error?
> > > 
> > > Maybe something is unwell in drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c.
> > 
> > At a quick glance, yes it could very well by vduse_init() is messy and
> > races somehow with init, but if a race does lurk here my instincts tell
> > me this can't be the only place.
> > 
> > Not sure if leaving a patch in place more time to see how else things
> > can explode is worth it.
> 
> Confused.  Are you thinking that the above-linked patch was somehow
> involved in this crash?  If so, but how?  All it does it to permit
> unprivileged reads to four ints via proc_dointvec_minmax()?

If the priv allows for it access to dereferencing a pointer is allowed.
How that race happens though, indeed is beyond the patch's fault.

  Luis