Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/11] iommu/sva: Assign a PASID to mm on PASID
 allocation and free it on mm exit
To:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, will@kernel.org
References: <tencent_76E043C4D1B6A21A5253579A61034107EB06@qq.com>
 <tencent_7477100F8A445C6CAFA8F13601A55134480A@qq.com>
 <YmJ/WA6KAQU/xJjA@myrica>
 <tencent_A4E83BA6071B2204B6F5D4E69A50D21C1A09@qq.com>
 <YmLOznyBF0f7COYT@myrica>
 <tencent_2922DAB6F3D5789A1CD3A21A843B4007ED09@qq.com>
 <Yman5hLomw9/c+bi@myrica> <76ec6342-0d7c-7c7b-c132-2892e4048fa1@intel.com>
 <YmavoKkVu+hd+x0M@myrica> <20220425083444.00af5674@jacob-builder>
 <YmbIjnHtibY7n4Wb@myrica>
From:   Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <cf27bf82-ca68-86f1-ac8f-a138713edd5f@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:28:00 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YmbIjnHtibY7n4Wb@myrica>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Jean

On 2022/4/26 上午12:13, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
>> Hi Jean-Philippe,
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:26:40 +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker
>> <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 07:18:36AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>>> On 4/25/22 06:53, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 07:13:39PM +0800, zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5.17
>>>>>>>> fops_release is called automatically, as well as
>>>>>>>> iommu_sva_unbind_device. On 5.18-rc1.
>>>>>>>> fops_release is not called, have to manually call close(fd)
>>>>>>> Right that's weird
>>>>>> Looks it is caused by the fix patch, via mmget, which may add
>>>>>> refcount of fd.
>>>>> Yes indirectly I think: when the process mmaps the queue,
>>>>> mmap_region() takes a reference to the uacce fd. That reference is
>>>>> released either by explicit close() or munmap(), or by exit_mmap()
>>>>> (which is triggered by mmput()). Since there is an mm->fd dependency,
>>>>> we cannot add a fd->mm dependency, so no mmget()/mmput() in
>>>>> bind()/unbind().
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess we should go back to refcounted PASIDs instead, to avoid
>>>>> freeing them until unbind().
>>>> Yeah, this is a bit gnarly for -rc4.  Let's just make sure there's
>>>> nothing else simple we can do.
>>>>
>>>> How does the IOMMU hardware know that all activity to a given PASID is
>>>> finished?  That activity should, today, be independent of an mm or a
>>>> fd's lifetime.
>>> In the case of uacce, it's tied to the fd lifetime: opening an accelerator
>>> queue calls iommu_sva_bind_device(), which sets up the PASID context in
>>> the IOMMU. Closing the queue calls iommu_sva_unbind_device() which
>>> destroys the PASID context (after the device driver stopped all DMA for
>>> this PASID).
>>>
>> For VT-d, it is essentially the same flow except managed by the individual
>> drivers such as DSA.
>> If free() happens before unbind(), we deactivate the PASIDs and suppress
>> faults from the device. When the unbind finally comes, we finalize the
>> PASID teardown. It seems we have a need for an intermediate state where
>> PASID is "pending free"?
> Yes we do have that state, though I'm not sure we need to make it explicit
> in the ioasid allocator.
>
> Could we move mm_pasid_drop() to __mmdrop() instead of __mmput()?  For Arm
> we do need to hold the mm_count until unbind(), and mmgrab()/mmdrop() is
> also part of Lu's rework [1].

Move mm_pasid_drop to __mmdrop looks workable.

The nginx works since ioasid is not freed when master exit until nginx stop.

The ioasid does not free immediately when fops_release->unbind finished.
Instead, __mmdrop happens a bit lazy,  which has no issue though
I passed 10000 times exit without unbind test, the pasid allocation is ok.

Thanks


diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 9796897560ab..60f417f69367 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -792,6 +792,8 @@ void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
         mmu_notifier_subscriptions_destroy(mm);
         check_mm(mm);
         put_user_ns(mm->user_ns);
+       mm_pasid_drop(mm);
         free_mm(mm);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mmdrop);
@@ -1190,7 +1192,6 @@ static inline void __mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
         }
         if (mm->binfmt)
                 module_put(mm->binfmt->module);
-       mm_pasid_drop(mm);
         mmdrop(mm);
  }

>
> Thanks,
> Jean
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20220421052121.3464100-9-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/