Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <4719fce9-4235-f1d7-f95e-67e5a47a0968@i2se.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:48:06 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
        Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@redhat.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Serge Schneider <serge@raspberrypi.org>,
        Mattias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        fedora-rpi@googlegroups.com, Daniel Bauman <dbauman@redhat.com>,
        Mwesigwa Guma <mguma@redhat.com>,
        Joel Savitz <jsavitz@redhat.com>
References: <20220419205158.28088-1-cmirabil@redhat.com>
 <CANiq72n1gBE+tv3oAF4wjdK2jEJJmU4V=Y1CTZ1PpCEeqLbo9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABe3_aE-nQzZazLfxk1OnCNRF0sDqcWi6gieYSf4O4aYS_Ahog@mail.gmail.com>
 <06e0138a526f1fd9fe5b18184163c1ff98f0103b.camel@redhat.com>
From:   Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
In-Reply-To: <06e0138a526f1fd9fe5b18184163c1ff98f0103b.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
> Hi Charles, Miguel,
>
> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
>> Hi Miguel—
>>
>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up.
>>
>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained
>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux-
>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks!
> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I
> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if
> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have
> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers.
Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please 
give him the common 2 weeks for a review.
>
> I'll do a last review during the week.
>
> Regards,
>