Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <4971fae3-8a47-50af-dedb-aac90db90de2@i2se.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:12:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Conor.Dooley@microchip.com, nsaenzju@redhat.com,
        cmirabil@redhat.com, miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, serge@raspberrypi.org,
        mbrugger@suse.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, fedora-rpi@googlegroups.com,
        dbauman@redhat.com, mguma@redhat.com, jsavitz@redhat.com
References: <20220419205158.28088-1-cmirabil@redhat.com>
 <CANiq72n1gBE+tv3oAF4wjdK2jEJJmU4V=Y1CTZ1PpCEeqLbo9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABe3_aE-nQzZazLfxk1OnCNRF0sDqcWi6gieYSf4O4aYS_Ahog@mail.gmail.com>
 <06e0138a526f1fd9fe5b18184163c1ff98f0103b.camel@redhat.com>
 <4719fce9-4235-f1d7-f95e-67e5a47a0968@i2se.com>
 <60c3e7e4-6406-ecaa-e89b-fc2d359d8d31@microchip.com>
From:   Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
In-Reply-To: <60c3e7e4-6406-ecaa-e89b-fc2d359d8d31@microchip.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Am 26.04.22 um 14:03 schrieb Conor.Dooley@microchip.com:
> On 26/04/2022 12:48, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
>>> Hi Charles, Miguel,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
>>>> Hi Miguel—
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained
>>>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux-
>>>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks!
>>> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I
>>> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if
>>> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have
>>> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers.
>> Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please give him the common 2 weeks for a review.
> You have one from Krzysztof on the bindings, that should be sufficient?
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainers.html#open-firmware-and-flattened-device-tree-bindings
Yes, you are right
>
>>> I'll do a last review during the week.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel