Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2086:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a6csp4360646ioa; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrt5ZAIvyx2wZWnFnq3l/bOAkqPmJfnGCdp6T6xysgiDmU1CR2WVeJjgPmcyE46tkIoNRD X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1a89:b0:1d2:f7ae:4928 with SMTP id ng9-20020a17090b1a8900b001d2f7ae4928mr42678922pjb.46.1651049777330; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1651049777; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BjSZyVJEvWWadpOgA1rqUf0X2ffAnK4dcatGG4bQg2DVoin9JnvaHKZB8foJ5ET0V2 ek6PWwyhVPYYG+fIeXy95IdEx0jPjyRmQFhspI+nfFY5NTAL7GWdNgUYDKnu6rgrltGw jG7agwFdkgKqkO2ukaRWFSE3MOBtOPQ5yBlWtLpErriXnXxfm4KiJtISfVD7aGVEV3Em krQZfIQGwSZ0ai9r9LQirzO3aaqqmu1wMVi/LvuPo+L0Yb6VCMfdeV8D9xijsy0u3pW9 hJeEqU+GOVHbudoDKPe/t92vxJHjyE3bZqz9TYtnxW7Tvgyv5F/RCsS+cDkDSFyperG9 zUyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=7hZ4NlywNWUFYBQb0YGqu4i/SGqufP1jy2acawUvOAk=; b=g8m4LctSC8nI2rTMSCSBnrlO6Wfks4I+poQdEw/Mxe7JMvjxXJayDrr4v0MX88NfyM L5ny0u3ZMJBM14uUBDdQxmztNZBrFgX8A9VSD5OUQ7Lb8y5Bqd8wrrwe1Hjhp5nyqatO Xqyrz1qmAJBrqwMwMMr9bxYKdDhYIBhwSz+4/LQG1NxPZabl2fTO4jQ+erYWurOw1Jfc n1Kq35AZfjzSE54PMr79lfCWKvtarCnsrWl17JGtt6e3Ee0fJWR9BOFBsGboRN3gsDa4 1R1gH+86hpApd8uYGtRBfK3qym0D46OHxLD4BLHuT2hRbJJ+mL2Va8w5tkM4zajUk4fa 5+DA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="iC8rIJ+/"; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s25-20020a635259000000b0039e4b245663si909176pgl.703.2022.04.27.01.56.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="iC8rIJ+/"; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CE31A430F; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1357206AbiD0Chm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:37:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1357196AbiD0Chj (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:37:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC206E4CF for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:34:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1651026869; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7hZ4NlywNWUFYBQb0YGqu4i/SGqufP1jy2acawUvOAk=; b=iC8rIJ+/jbOtBV+y5vthGCn+TzxCE7qntiYRD8dyadJi0htQbxxjBVNzbbKo8y7v3tR6EC fsvD1SwIlbkuzglbPuqiBz7cf/K6T9nrx61oYb1kvWPOEag6A6oJLES5at5y54kQUkABnA BAFbZMyzhq8xh0YJR4I1T/cTE1Uj/zY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-246-qaEU4A3LP2-mlluaJGPavg-1; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:34:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qaEU4A3LP2-mlluaJGPavg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E63101AA44; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.22.16.78] (unknown [10.22.16.78]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3AC40D282D; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4c6847ba-4c8d-9776-a065-684a8b95130b@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:34:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: Remove cpus_allowed/mems_allowed setup in cpuset_init_smp() Content-Language: en-US To: Feng Tang Cc: Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , "Hansen, Dave" , "Huang, Ying" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" References: <20220425155505.1292896-1-longman@redhat.com> <20220426032337.GA84190@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20220427010654.GC84190@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: <20220427010654.GC84190@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE, TVD_SUBJ_WIPE_DEBT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/26/22 21:06, Feng Tang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:58:21PM +0800, Waiman Long wrote: >> On 4/25/22 23:23, Feng Tang wrote: >>> Hi Waiman, >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:55:05AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>> There are 3 places where the cpu and node masks of the top cpuset can >>>> be initialized in the order they are executed: >>>> 1) start_kernel -> cpuset_init() >>>> 2) start_kernel -> cgroup_init() -> cpuset_bind() >>>> 3) kernel_init_freeable() -> do_basic_setup() -> cpuset_init_smp() >>>> >>>> The first cpuset_init() function just sets all the bits in the masks. >>>> The last one executed is cpuset_init_smp() which sets up cpu and node >>>> masks suitable for v1, but not v2. cpuset_bind() does the right setup >>>> for both v1 and v2. >>>> >>>> For systems with cgroup v2 setup, cpuset_bind() is called once. For >>>> systems with cgroup v1 setup, cpuset_bind() is called twice. It is >>>> first called before cpuset_init_smp() in cgroup v2 mode. Then it is >>>> called again when cgroup v1 filesystem is mounted in v1 mode after >>>> cpuset_init_smp(). >>>> >>>> [ 2.609781] cpuset_bind() called - v2 = 1 >>>> [ 3.079473] cpuset_init_smp() called >>>> [ 7.103710] cpuset_bind() called - v2 = 0 >>> I run some test, on a server with centOS, this did happen that >>> cpuset_bind() is called twice, first as v2 during kernel boot, >>> and then as v1 post-boot. >>> >>> However on a QEMU running with a basic debian rootfs image, >>> the second call of cpuset_bind() didn't happen. >> The first time cpuset_bind() is called in cgroup_init(), the kernel >> doesn't know if userspace is going to mount v1 or v2 cgroup. By default, >> it is assumed to be v2. However, if userspace mounts the cgroup v1 >> filesystem for cpuset, cpuset_bind() will be run at this point by >> rebind_subsystem() to set up cgroup v1 environment and >> cpus_allowed/mems_allowed will be correctly set at this point. Mounting >> the cgroup v2 filesystem, however, does not cause rebind_subsystem() to >> run and hence cpuset_bind() is not called again. >> >> Is the QEMU setup not mounting any cgroup filesystem at all? If so, does >> it matter whether v1 or v2 setup is used? > When I got the cpuset binding error report, I tried first on qemu to > reproduce and failed (due to there was no memory hotplug), then I > reproduced it on a real server. For both system, I used "cgroup_no_v1=all" > cmdline parameter to test cgroup-v2, could this be the reason? (TBH, > this is the first time I use cgroup-v2). > > Here is the info dump: > > # mount | grep cgroup > tmpfs on /sys/fs/cgroup type tmpfs (ro,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755) > cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd type cgroup (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,release_agent=/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd) > > #cat /proc/filesystems | grep cgroup > nodev cgroup > nodev cgroup2 > > Thanks, > Feng For cgroup v2, cpus_allowed should be set to cpu_possible_mask and mems_allowed to node_possible_map as is done in the first invocation of cpuset_bind(). That is the correct behavior. Cheers, Longman