Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220421192132.109954-1-nick.hawkins@hpe.com> <20220421192132.109954-5-nick.hawkins@hpe.com>
 <CAK8P3a0nQ1BrtfBJ7sUSaLkA=pbVwx83bEUpZczvLOSOHDR=dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdbJ1N7VOgoBzGS+cOaErFcYiOVDeWRmhPyHA7=9W0CGhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a2ie8kFYstCYr6FO6+yFw7VxyJjWYyy9b+rUHu_u0YXPg@mail.gmail.com> <YmhmXl5IWHmKzAyG@robh.at.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <YmhmXl5IWHmKzAyG@robh.at.kernel.org>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 23:55:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3+TGSJgJ2-mgj+NjT3k8uuUpesLErwqZ2M_dkNqbMXXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/11] clocksource/drivers: Add HPE GXP timer
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@hpe.com>,
        "Verdun, Jean-Marie" <verdun@hpe.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:38 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 08:00:20AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 10:38 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

> > There are multiple ways of doing this that we already discussed
> > in the thread. The easiest is probably to have a child node without
> > custom registers in the DT and then use the DT helpers to
> > populate the linux devices with the correct data.
>
> I think that's what the wdt binding is doing, but I don't like that.
> Maybe it's not a child node, I can't tell.
>
> Bindings should not be decided on the *current* driver split on one
> particular OS. This looks like 1 block, so 1 node.

Fair enough.

> If that doesn't work well or easy for Linux, then we should fix Linux.

Doing a simple platform_device_create_pdata() should work fine here,
the only problem that might exist is if the wdt driver needs access to
DT properties, as we can't have both devices refer to the same of_node
pointer, which would cause them to be picked up by the timer driver
again.

      Arnd