Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:49:05 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Use generic node name
 for DMA
Message-ID: <YmhawW3wAn7HAUVC@ripper>
References: <20220421171809.32722-1-singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
 <20220421171809.32722-2-singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
 <YmQjW4OYe5rTBP/Q@ripper>
 <20220423180934.GA35431@9a2d8922b8f1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220423180934.GA35431@9a2d8922b8f1>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat 23 Apr 11:09 PDT 2022, Kuldeep Singh wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 09:03:39AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 21 Apr 10:18 PDT 2022, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> > 
> > > Qcom BAM DT spec expects generic DMA controller node name as
> > > "dma-controller" to enable validations.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > 
> > It seems that I picked up v3, but patchwork-bot didn't send out any
> > notifications.
> 
> Yes, somehow there was no notification for this series as well as geni
> uart/i2c patches also.
> 
> >
> > Please double check linux-next to confirm that we got them all sorted
> > out.
> 
> I checked dma dts patches[1] and they are in next/linux-next.
> I hope I checked the right tree, please correct me if it's wrong.
> 
> Please note, there was one small typo fix from v3->v4 in commit
> header(s/User/Use). Not sure if it's worth updating as it's already in
> next tree, upto you. Thanks!
> 

I generally never rebase my trees, as that's causing issues for anyone
references commits in my tree. So we'll have to live with this typo.

Thanks,
Bjorn