Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2086:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a6csp4376840ioa; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:23:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtZfW/aphm7i0OBamMuS+h/dMTI6JyBjbxtwLn2Y44LE6GxDzmdO2PdmGfpqvj++XLy8/X X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:38ca:b0:1da:4df6:a000 with SMTP id nn10-20020a17090b38ca00b001da4df6a000mr432305pjb.188.1651051396067; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:23:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1651051396; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UUpIXo8kmOrI6YLqdr02k+s5yc1vFPHrAx3y4koDLFMYTqxAl/yEzODU39BKtc2j17 K1BEAiP1tCWIy4z2RWgKPvd1Xcxi7soNuLQyC922O17KaQ/oTLRqvH3cIIEsVD3KIBXU kJ3k3bktI8JEPeKBMBVIbcBDqWlvFfHw1x4owv8qwIssMGMiO+OKjNsgdcRksiz5Yn9Z LVg9p3q07TPW6GR+Qt3GJg0YnK3fYWtBTi0veilacio7HY2YnR1aFyCdCInG7hSK0p7T 3mflIsbqGqmoFnz0eGIseoBFhbDP0jFIw01rW5Nx/3NmxlVG4uCBW+ujA5RaQfDQdFJ4 910A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:cc:to:from; bh=XT4RxRdPZwMfQnxOWyQpWm8ErEdSXNBxdHo7yMxi+jM=; b=PWS6P3bXT+EEh4dCo3U8onxfION8LjrKSfub824ehr0tHg13ialgBb6sjmO5+XJ+Bm OtlJFC93VRNVYglf37wjvyxGFaX4Sud8F+bhSly3vLfXXSEBPcP2JoBZ2GypQpEpy5og w5plA+xR4+e/nJbMDzWCvBou2J7R92Q2XI9VvET6fjJK5FxPzXPfFyKjtkR0u5e+u/iJ yZnKMSZlsaQBLx4Iz5pNfSABAQW1pogNbxbnOuRrSbmH7kgz2Bi7ztlGXXsIfIxVbHKp Jrk4QwbN3UZUNMrJaEAc9pkYYdjCuySb4wjs7w3WG/RzciQBq4t7EOS6hp6T/nFcYpU5 G86g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g28-20020aa796bc000000b004fa3a8e0035si813547pfk.236.2022.04.27.02.23.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461872435AA; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 02:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231712AbiDZRWs (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:22:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60706 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230450AbiDZRWo (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:22:44 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD7D44753; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:49348) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1njOqb-00AeV8-5Z; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:19:33 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-174-4.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.174.4]:35722 helo=email.froward.int.ebiederm.org.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1njOqa-002Nau-7s; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:19:32 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , rjw@rjwysocki.net, mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20220426055122.GA29684@redhat.com> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:51:23 +0200") References: <20220421150248.667412396@infradead.org> <20220421150654.817117821@infradead.org> <20220425143537.GA12412@redhat.com> <20220425183343.GM2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <87pml4llvm.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220426055122.GA29684@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:19:20 -0500 Message-ID: <878rrrkbjb.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1njOqa-002Nau-7s;;;mid=<878rrrkbjb.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.174.4;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=softfail X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+mtzpiqhlhzhmU0iIbDnQQBdvVxBQ/W88= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.174.4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ***;Oleg Nesterov X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 301 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (3.7%), b_tie_ro: 10 (3.2%), parse: 1.33 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 4.0 (1.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.13 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 5 (1.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.77 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 1.48 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 86 (28.7%), check_bayes: 84 (28.0%), b_tokenize: 7 (2.4%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (2.0%), b_comp_prob: 2.3 (0.8%), b_tok_touch_all: 65 (21.6%), b_finish: 1.03 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 168 (55.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.51 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.8 (0.9%), poll_dns_idle: 0.96 (0.3%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 8 (2.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched,ptrace: Fix ptrace_check_attach() vs PREEMPT_RT X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg Nesterov writes: > On 04/25, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> I don't see JOBCTL_TRACED_QUIESCE being cleared "if (!current->ptrace)". > > As Peter explained, in this case we can rely on __ptrace_unlink() which > should clear this flag. I had missed that that signal_wake_up_state was clearing JOBCTL_TRACED_QUIESCE. Relying on __ptrace_unlink assumes the __ptrace_unlink happens after siglock is taken before calling ptrace_stop. Especially with the ptrace_notify in signal_delivered that does not look guaranteed. The __ptrace_unlink could also happen during arch_ptrace_stop. Relying on siglock is sufficient because __ptrace_unlink holds siglock over clearing task->ptrace. Which means that the simple fix for this is to just test task->ptrace before we set JOBCTL_TRACED_QUEIESCE. Eric