Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220424090422.97070-1-wanjiabing@vivo.com> <CAPDyKFreW44ou8O4R53XUf7iZTGBBMM+1jmrOeh9cyEOTU-r1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <YmgKa4xQ+pOd2xfh@myhostname>
In-Reply-To: <YmgKa4xQ+pOd2xfh@myhostname>
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:43:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp38EKC88wGZyYm3agvY9zC2M6-qAgMqmOHne0kkDAhCg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: simplify if-if to if-else
To:     Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Cc:     Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
        linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kael_w@yeah.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 at 17:06, Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 at 11:04, Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Use if and else instead of if(A) and if (!A).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 3 +--
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> > > index 807177c953f3..98893ccad4bd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> > > @@ -1125,8 +1125,7 @@ atmci_prepare_data_dma(struct atmel_mci *host, struct mmc_data *data)
> > >         chan = host->dma.chan;
> > >         if (chan)
> > >                 host->data_chan = chan;
> > > -
> > > -       if (!chan)
> > > +       else
> > >                 return -ENODEV;
> >
> > To make a slightly better improvement of the code, I suggest we add an
> > early bail out point in the atmci_prepare_data_dma() function. Like
> > below:
> >
> > if (!host->dma.chan)
> >      return -ENODEV;
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Uffe
>
> OK
>
> How about this new patch?

Please post a new version in plain text, not as an attachment.

Kind regards
Uffe