Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20070508.134101.122616112.davem@davemloft.net>
To: sam@ravnborg.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bogus section mismatch errors?
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070508115220.GA29160@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <20070508111759.GA26562@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20070508115220.GA29160@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 955
Lines: 23

From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:52:20 +0200

> There are in slab a function that is not marked __init that refer to a function marked
> __init. But the logic surrounding makes it OK.
> 
> I have no fix/workaround for this.
> Andres has suggested that we should mark functions/data that may refer to __init{data}
> with something like: __nowarn and __nowarndata
> 
> I am planning to implement something so we can mark functions/data with:
> __init_ref_ok and _init_data_ref_ok
> Which is indeed more ugly but expalins what is actually OK.
> 
> I hope to take a look during the weekend.

Thanks for working on this, it's the only mismatch I still see
on sparc64 in current GIT :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/