Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:41:13 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc:     brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
        kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, glider@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kfence: test: use new suite_{init/exit} support, add
 .kunitconfig
Message-ID: <Ymk56YygGUU52CHG@elver.google.com>
References: <20220426181925.3940286-1-dlatypov@google.com>
 <20220426181925.3940286-3-dlatypov@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220426181925.3940286-3-dlatypov@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.4 (2021-12-11)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:19AM -0700, 'Daniel Latypov' via kasan-dev wrote:
> Currently, the kfence test suite could not run via "normal" means since
> KUnit didn't support per-suite setup/teardown. So it manually called
> internal kunit functions to run itself.
> This has some downsides, like missing TAP headers => can't use kunit.py
> to run or even parse the test results (w/o tweaks).
> 
> Use the newly added support and convert it over, adding a .kunitconfig
> so it's even easier to run from kunit.py.
> 
> People can now run the test via
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=mm/kfence --arch=x86_64
> ...
> [11:02:32] Testing complete. Passed: 23, Failed: 0, Crashed: 0, Skipped: 2, Errors: 0
> [11:02:32] Elapsed time: 43.562s total, 0.003s configuring, 9.268s building, 34.281s running
> 
> Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

> ---
>  mm/kfence/.kunitconfig  |  6 ++++++
>  mm/kfence/kfence_test.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 mm/kfence/.kunitconfig
> 
> diff --git a/mm/kfence/.kunitconfig b/mm/kfence/.kunitconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f3d65e939bfa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/kfence/.kunitconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> +CONFIG_KFENCE=y
> +CONFIG_KFENCE_KUNIT_TEST=y
> +
> +# Additional dependencies.
> +CONFIG_FTRACE=y
> diff --git a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
> index 1b50f70a4c0f..96206a4ee9ab 100644
> --- a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
> +++ b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c
> @@ -826,14 +826,6 @@ static void test_exit(struct kunit *test)
>  	test_cache_destroy();
>  }
>  
> -static struct kunit_suite kfence_test_suite = {
> -	.name = "kfence",
> -	.test_cases = kfence_test_cases,
> -	.init = test_init,
> -	.exit = test_exit,
> -};
> -static struct kunit_suite *kfence_test_suites[] = { &kfence_test_suite, NULL };
> -
>  static void register_tracepoints(struct tracepoint *tp, void *ignore)
>  {
>  	check_trace_callback_type_console(probe_console);
> @@ -847,11 +839,7 @@ static void unregister_tracepoints(struct tracepoint *tp, void *ignore)
>  		tracepoint_probe_unregister(tp, probe_console, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * We only want to do tracepoints setup and teardown once, therefore we have to
> - * customize the init and exit functions and cannot rely on kunit_test_suite().
> - */
> -static int __init kfence_test_init(void)
> +static int kfence_suite_init(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * Because we want to be able to build the test as a module, we need to
> @@ -859,18 +847,25 @@ static int __init kfence_test_init(void)
>  	 * won't work here.
>  	 */
>  	for_each_kernel_tracepoint(register_tracepoints, NULL);
> -	return __kunit_test_suites_init(kfence_test_suites);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void kfence_test_exit(void)
> +static void kfence_suite_exit(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
> -	__kunit_test_suites_exit(kfence_test_suites);
>  	for_each_kernel_tracepoint(unregister_tracepoints, NULL);
>  	tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
>  }
>  
> -late_initcall_sync(kfence_test_init);
> -module_exit(kfence_test_exit);
> +static struct kunit_suite kfence_test_suite = {
> +	.name = "kfence",
> +	.test_cases = kfence_test_cases,
> +	.init = test_init,
> +	.exit = test_exit,
> +	.suite_init = kfence_suite_init,
> +	.suite_exit = kfence_suite_exit,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(&kfence_test_suite);

Much nicer!

Thanks,
-- Marco