Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2086:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a6csp4678231ioa; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxxkpJizHYmSp3Izmj9x0Dtu9ztGlaBH64p7MugD2cqv7s79h9XMSaAnL0t6E2G3bRyhoe X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bcc5:b0:158:d637:8330 with SMTP id o5-20020a170902bcc500b00158d6378330mr28973624pls.134.1651074421571; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1651074421; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ct3A0C97zyK36sV9u9B6hE8xVKN10sv22F8qWYZ9cQ/6B4euVAJ9R6qz/mpY85AroV NgVhtM+IlPZ7lBeTPCRIEHe4W6IbZ1gOn67RiLKxbbbvI4rmqAHOS69Hi2RPxeEZtPmd 2+7n8azOzxwXRXrxarx3IlaTg+sXbaaoHdBsY8rBgblPAlkFuKff0mSP67k9PttIZOP+ VsjcJ24OVhqW7CaQaMmrRO6Aey38qSRqXrYBm9Ova45B18mi+I4BrpGzHo+3ycpOBxRN ql89u6aSF7aQ0G5yVkRbLqtG9VmAciEFLmTWuMTta110E+PuS5rr7VpQYk0OqZp8a7NE J7Tg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=OTNDlQFqEPUAvQQcM3NJWH+KFDpLAUw6Kc262wL/c/k=; b=M/zhW+Re1OQO+LhoRGx1+wfGbVwXKDnW/jUlG/oWIW3jlj6gQnBSYYGqc3MShenuAN 4QBfAEW25hvwmRWw7kFTbvs7o15ZVTt8NehZ/0cTnsnSQP0NEMl9tIPb60WQVjCx6+LK BTr3MbEbUqshCND2K92cD0RURmz8ZdQBgK4ya6bExbBU+rTShflzKe0UMVXgCkwJHxCz EWK4cDRXlpGyF3f3J28cg+AAk55EUT6u5hVRZLjsi/ZbzxjMx2OaoyVeSgHldXjYiqs3 nog1hXBO3gqDhYYDMf3CQvOw9z71zw54A7/tUZweEXntZWch1Qgjs6KF5S/BsqhqXqk3 Z2zw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=difYPAM9; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s7-20020a056a00194700b005056d85e53dsi1843211pfk.163.2022.04.27.08.47.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=difYPAM9; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B554A2E70A3; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239599AbiD0PXq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:23:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40598 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239626AbiD0PXm (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:23:42 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BDF41323 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1651072830; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OTNDlQFqEPUAvQQcM3NJWH+KFDpLAUw6Kc262wL/c/k=; b=difYPAM9bNSoukOJplc4GZ2zQKgHkoX+qcA76//fAmFFEwXTrgAgcfqFp2jz54tXuRGvJX 0SpGTuqq6kEGgchBH6KJb3QqdR5Xbc1ZHm0yo0AAKgqMTBiXiW3DsThzVkb/oYaEHijdgD DGL8EY53Ur1TtG4/4krrdkSoBqDXCSk= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-553-f5UXHB-mN7-R7kk0TqKSrQ-1; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:20:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: f5UXHB-mN7-R7kk0TqKSrQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5CB48039D7; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.40.192.128]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 025FD403149; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 oleg@redhat.com; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:20:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:20:18 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de, bigeasy@linutronix.de, Will Deacon , tj@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , inux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook , Jann Horn Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] ptrace: Use siglock instead of tasklist_lock in ptrace_check_attach Message-ID: <20220427152016.GF17421@redhat.com> References: <878rrrh32q.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220426225211.308418-8-ebiederm@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220426225211.308418-8-ebiederm@xmission.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/26, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > + if (lock_task_sighand(child, &flags)) { > + if (child->ptrace && child->parent == current) { > + WARN_ON(READ_ONCE(child->__state) == __TASK_TRACED); > + /* > + * child->sighand can't be NULL, release_task() > + * does ptrace_unlink() before __exit_signal(). > + */ > + if (ignore_state || ptrace_freeze_traced(child)) > + ret = 0; The comment above is no longer relevant, it should be removed. Oleg.